Last night I began reading a book that I recently purchased and I realized that I need to seek advice on this forum.
Below is a direct, unabridged quote from page 7 of the book entitled “Turning Green Wood” by Michael O’Donnell, Sterling Press, reprinted 2002.
“Hardwood trees in the northern hemisphere build reaction wood on the tension side of the pith, which gives rise to growth rings in branches being wider on the tension side (the upper side) than on the compression side. In the southern hemisphere this is reversed: hardwoods build the reaction wood on the compression side of the pith (the underside of the branch). Softwood trees on the other hand produce reaction wood on the opposite side of the pith to hardwoods in both northern and southern hemispheres.”
YIKES – can some please explain this to me?
Before someone strats to flame me for trashing this book, please note that my initial perusal of the remainder of the book is that the book is excellent to outstanding simply for the detail and especially illustrations of various permutations of grain orientation. For this I would highly recommend it to everyone.
However having said that, I am totally clueless why reaction wood would form on the tension side of a hardwood tree limb in Maine but on the compression side of the same limb of the same tree if she were growing in New South Wales for example. This seems totally absurd to me.
Can someone please help out here???
Replies
Brill, reaction wood is abnormal wood tissue produced by the tree in an effort to alter the direction of growth of the trunk or branches. Through methods not yet well understood, the terminal buds of the tree produce growth hormones that are somehow directed in differing amounts back along the the vascular tissue between the cambium layer and the inner bark to the point along one side of the trunk or stem where growth must be either accelerated or retarded in order to cause a change in the direction of growth. It's kind of like how a tank turns by changing the speed of the tread on one side or the other. The primary purpose of this process is to allow the tree to better position its foliage to capture sunlight when obstructions occur in its immediate environment.
The more primitive gymnosperms (softwoods) and the more advanced angiosperms (hardwoods) have "elected" opposite strategies for accomplishing this task. The softwoods achieve it by creating compression wood on the inside of the bend, while hardwoods create tension wood on the opposite (outside) of the bend. reaction wood of either type has radically different (much higher) longitudinal shrinkage than does normal wood tissue...and this often leads to warping and cross-grain checking as the wood is seasoned. Also, the porosity of reaction wood differs from that of normal wood tissue, causing blotches when the wood is stained.
As for there being a difference between how this process would function based on which hemisphere the tree is growing in is a new one on me. It doesn't seem to make sense that it would and, if there is any reseach to that effect, I've missed it.
Edited 4/25/2003 2:21:06 PM ET by Jon Arno
Botanist here, not a wood anatomist... but I cannot explain the
statement quoted except by saying that I think something got turned
around someplace, and not with you!
Gymnosperms (softwoods) make compression wood on the underside
of branch/trunk junctions; Angiosperms (hardwoods) make tension wood on the upper side of branch/trunk junctions. All the herbarium specimens of woods I've seen from the southern hemisphere had the
same orientation of reaction wood as species from the northern
hemisphere, so I think you're on solid ground here.
Auxins and ethylene (two classes of plant hormones) appear to be
part of what controls the formation of reaction wood. When gymnosperms have high concentrations of auxins localized in the
low side of a tilted bit of wood, you get compression wood (on the
lower side). Low concentrations of auxins elicit tension wood
formation (upper side) in angiosperms.
Kay, you're right. I know better, but I have "inside" and "outside" reversed in my post. Thanks for the correction.
Edited 4/25/2003 5:25:34 PM ET by Jon Arno
Jon and Kay, thanks very much for the prompt and informative responses.
That's waht's really great about this forum.
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled