I built the Eric Tan/Matt Kenney workbench for my daughter. She loved it! And I really enjoyed making it. Now I’m trying to find a work table/desk to build for a corner home office space, and I wondered about possibly modifying Eric’s design. I’d make it a bit lower, at a comfortable height to sit. But I’d need to eliminate three pieces on the front: the top and bottom rail, and the middle post. In thinking about how everything holds together, I believe this might not compromise stability very much at all, certainly not enough to worry about when using it as a writing/computer desk. And I might make the top a bit less beefy. I know this is probably overkill for my needs, but I loved the project. What do people think? (Of course I could always ask my daughter to disassemble and then reassemble her bench without those parts to test it out.)
Discussion Forum
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialCategories
Discussion Forum
Digital Plans Library
Member exclusive! – Plans for everyone – from beginners to experts – right at your fingertips.
Highlights
-
Shape Your Skills
when you sign up for our emails
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. -
Shop Talk Live Podcast
-
Our favorite articles and videos
-
E-Learning Courses from Fine Woodworking
-
-
Replies
What is the "Eric Tan/Matt Kenney" workbench? Do you have a picture of it?
If you're sure you can build a modified version then draw it out so you can see what you need to do. My bet is you'll figure it out since you've already built one according to plans. Good luck & don't under-estimate yourself.
Mikaol
Assuming you mean https://www.finewoodworking.com/project-guides/shop-projects/a-small-sturdy-workbench then You will have no problems.
basically what you will be making is more or less a traditional trestle table but with the stretcher at the back instead of in the middle. There will be a very slightly greater tendency for the feet to splay outwards if kicked at the front, but I can't see this being a problem at all given its envisaged use.
A knock-down desk that doesn’t require an Allen key to assemble? You are a radical!
Rails of some kind in the front will hold the whole thing square and prevent racking. I would not eliminate them completely. Maybe thinner rails turned on the flat, one dovetailed in at the very top of the legs and one a bit lower to form a shallow drawer pocket?
You won't be planing on the desk will you? With the top as thick as it is and the end trestles as heavy as they are I think you'd manage. I would consider lag screws through the top bearers into the top just behind the front legs. Counter bore the holes so the heads aren't visible. If you wanted you could add a rail at the top but I doubt you'd need it.
I made the desk 29 in. tall here. The rail I show has the same scantliings as the rails on the sides and there 25-3/8 in. knee room.
How long would you make the desk? If it was a bit longer you could add some knees from the front legs to the underside of the top. third image is with the desk top at 60 in. long.
You do wonderful work Dave.
Thank you, sir.
I second John C2's comment. I also really enjoy and learn from the helpful Sketch Up mini lessons you post. Thanks for those
Thank you, Jim. It's nice to hear that sort of thing.
If I were to do the same (I looked up the plans — very cool bench) I would add three aprons. One across the back & one across each side. That will restore the rigidity lost by removing the three stretchers.
The only three pieces that need removing are the three on the front. Two horizontal and one vertical. With the tenons on the tops of the legs fitted into the mortises on the underside of the top, adding aprons on the back and ends wouldn't be needed.
DaveRichards - side note. Assumimg your three sepia tone illustrations were Layout exports? It appears the cast shadows have a engravers mark style? Is this a standard option in Layout? Nice image quality.
Just SketchUp. Didn't bother with LayOut for these.
thanks
Agree the M&T would work. Nice illustration.
Maybe this can help https://youtu.be/CfXohAQx_7s
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled