Is there an advantage to having a workbench with the long grain as the top surface over one with the face grain as the top surface? Will one orientation have a greater propensity to remain flat?
Greg
<!—->•••••••
Exo 35:30-35
<!—->
Is there an advantage to having a workbench with the long grain as the top surface over one with the face grain as the top surface? Will one orientation have a greater propensity to remain flat?
Greg
<!—->•••••••
Exo 35:30-35
<!—->
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialGet instant access to over 100 digital plans available only to UNLIMITED members. Start your 14-day FREE trial - and get building!
Become an UNLIMITED member and get it all: searchable online archive of every issue, how-to videos, Complete Illustrated Guide to Woodworking digital series, print magazine, e-newsletter, and more.
Get complete site access to video workshops, digital plans library, online archive, and more, plus the print magazine.
Already a member? Log in
Replies
Maybe I'm a little slow this morning, but your terms "long grain" and "face grain" are confusing.
If you are looking to create a stable bench top out of solid wood, you have two options: build the top out of a few carefully chosen pieces of straight grained quarter sawn wood or glue up the top out of many smaller strips, with random grain orientation, which minimizes the effect of any single strip's warping. Some wood species are naturally more stable than others so wood choice is also a factor.
John White
The local lumber suppliers I have checked with tell me they have a difficult time getting anything quartersawn except white oak. So I am looking for the next best option: I remember seeing a design where the center of the top (between aprons) was comprised of three 2-1/2" thick boards ranging from 5 to 7" wide. My question— Is it better to use boards in this orientation or get stock as thick as possible (12/4) , rip them 2-1/2 or 3 " wide and rotate them 90 degrees so that the "face grain" is the glue surface? In this orientation, will wood movement direct be mostly along the top thickness instead of along the top width?Either way, should the boards be alternatively flipped so that the growth ring curvature reverses at each board?Greg
<!---->•••••••
Exo 35:30-35<!---->
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled