Replies

1. 
   MikeHennessy | Jan 23, 2009 08:38pm | #1

   I, for one, actually prefer a low-powered saw. IMHO, it reduces opportunities for kickback and encourages having sharp blades. I generally use a WWII on mine, and don't have any problems cutting 2" hardwood stock unless the stock has some serious internal stresses and, in that case, I'd rather the blade stall than kick.

   Mike Hennessy
   Pittsburgh, PA

1. 
   pezzi | Jan 23, 2009 08:58pm | #2

   Also, sticking with thin kerf blades will let the 1 1/2 HP go farther. Still if it's a great deal get the motor anyway. You can use it for tons of stuff. Build a drum sander, for example.

2. 
   Knotscott | Jan 23, 2009 09:04pm | #3

   Bill - The pulleys, bearings, and support mechanisms of your saw aren't made to handle the additional mass and torque of a bigger motor. That doesn't mean it won't do it, but it's possible the added stress could mess up the alignment, or cause failures in something. Any additional size could also cause the motor to protrude over the top of the saw when tilted.

   With good alignment, and good blade selection your saw really shouldn't struggle that much even in 3" material. A good clean sharp low tooth count thin kerf with a steep positive hook angle should rip to full blade height with relative ease.

1. 
   bilyo | Jan 23, 2009 11:20pm | #4

   Thanks to everyone for your input. It is gut wrenching to pass up a good deal. But, I guess it really is overkill and I don't need it otherwise.
   Thanks,
   Bill