Hi,
Looking for opinions on the Lee Valley / Veritas spokeshave (the $65 one with wooden handles and shims for the mouth opening, not the low-angle spokeshave). It will be for occasional, varied use, but I would like to experience a tool that has less chatter and better action than some of the old lightweights I own.
Thanks.
Replies
I own the two new spokeshaves and the low angle one that Lee Valley offers. All of them work great. The new ones are really nice. They work flawlessly. I have no reservations about recommending them.
Thanks for your reply .... did you have to do anything to the spokeshave in the way of tuning before it was ready to go?
dazz,
Dave's shaves......look em up on Google....the recommended shave for the chair makers up in Hampton, New Hampshire
No, it came out of the box ready to go. I just read a review in ####new woodworking magazine that recommended the new LV and the L-N. The shave throat is nicely machined, and the blade is razor sharp. I used it for shaping curves on a Maloof style rocker.
Douglesso,
Do you have problems with the low angle SS, in regards to the blade poping out?
I seem to have problems getting the screws tight enough to hold the blade/iron in place. I'm constantly having to stop and re-tighten it.
Yes I have the same problem also, I haven't had to re-grind the blade yet, just been honing it but it seems as though its just a tad too long and the dovetail section is just barely engaging. Doesn't happen very often but it is annoying.
So long from Grand Forks,gtw
Hegeghog, your email is not working???????
Send me email at [email protected]
PlaneWood by Mike_in_Katy (maker of fine sawdust!)PlaneWood
Dazz,
Lee Valley/Veritas used to make a wooden-handled spokeshave designed by Brian Boggs. It was a truly excellent 'shave (it's now being manufactured by Lie-Nielsen).
Not surprisingly, the $65 'shave to which you refer is strikingly similar to Brian Boggs' design, and at a remarkably lower price point.
It looks like a tremendous bargain - I just hope it's not a Brian Boggs' expense.
-Jazzdogg-
Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, you're right.
Actually -
It's quite a bit different - materials, adjustment method, ergonomics, lever cap, handle attachment, and price...
Both have wood handles - but the similarities pretty much stop there.
Cheers -
Rob Lee
Lee Valley/Veritas
Rob, you'll be happy to know I ordered one this morning, although I see it's backordered .... must be a lot of demand for these little puppies, eh?
Thanks to all for the responses.
Dazz -
Thanks! We got hit pretty hard the end of last week - they'll be back in stock tomorrow, or the next day (at the latest)....
We just made and loaded a bunch more fixtures, and have significantly increased the production capacity... shouldn't run out again!
Cheers -
Rob
Rob
O.K., I'm convinced as I've been toying with the idea of the two new shaves to add to the low-angle. Now, let's say I call in the morning (Thur.) and you're still out of stock. I will go ahead and put them on back-order if I can tell them that Rob Lee said to "throw in" a Veritas #6 fore-plane for extensive testing in the southern U.S.! he.. he...
Nice set of shaves. When are the new shoulder planes due. I'm waiting patiently! An ETA would be appreciated.
Regards...
sarge..jt
Proud member of the : "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
Edited 3/3/2004 10:36:42 PM ET by SARGE
Hi -
There should be three "plane line" releases between now and July, barring some unforseen delay...
We have a new LA Jack-size (sort of) plane, the bullnose (in the shoulder series), the 073 style plane, and possibly the next spokeshave....we'll probably only get to one of the last two...
Cheers -
Rob
Rob
Thanks for the up-date. Curious to see the L.A. # 5 and would like to see the #73 arrive.
Now I will be serious a moment (only a moment). I think a shoulder plane in a 1" + would be a great compliment to the current medium shoulder. I wouldn't change anything on the design as the current medium shoulder is as good as it gets. For those that use shoulders, both the .773 and one in slightly over 1" have a place. Similar to the Stanley #93 in width, but with the excellent Vertias design you applied to the MS.
To take it up a notch, a thought is that a similar #93 as the Stanley does have a front that removes and you got a "bull-nose". In essence, you got my full attention with a 1" + and if you throw in a bull-nose by removing the front the checks "in the mail"! Nothing like "killing two birds with one stone" as we WW are looking for quality and versatility at a reasonable price.
I presume you already have the plans on the drawing board and it would be too late to consider those thoughts at this late stage. But that might give you an idea for the future and at my age in the mid-50's, better make it quick. ha.. ha...
Again, thanks for the reply...
sarge..jtProud member of the : "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
Hi -
We're actually machining the first castings of the small plane - (a #90 variant - bullnose/chisel)... it won't be that "weird"....
The #073 will follow very quickly - and it WILL put us back on the "weirdness" path... it'll be as fun as the medium shoulder was (is)....
Cheers -
Rob
Spokeshave redesigned / changed in recent years. Better? Worse?
It appears these shaves have undergone a redesign in recent years. They’re made differently now.
The older photos & reviews show a blade “bed” that is continuous and flat-milled. The current version shows a bed with a milled ‘dot’ above the cap screw and a milled ‘lip’ near the mouth. The blade is unsupported in between.
Any idea why the change? My first thought is that it’s a change for the worse, but I’m not qualified to say.
Big flat milled surfaces smack of quality, and seemingly could serve to dampen vibration and chatter. On the other hand, when I consider the physics of the blade, the cap & screw, and the consequent forces involved, it would seem to be of little or no consequence.
Any opinions?
Naturally the change would reduce material cost and manufacturing/machine time, but it has NOT been my experience that Lee Valley / Veritas to ever compromise design for cost. It HAS been my experience that they make the best tool they can, and then figure out what the price needs to be (which is never cheap).
The change would appear to save weight (perhaps with no “downside”), but as CartersWhittling mentioned, the extra weight is not a negative attribute.
Thoughts?
Where Rob Lee when you need him :-)
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled