Check out this Bedrock 604 I saw today on the bay. There’s no mention of the ‘alterations’ in the description. Apparently, the poor seller has no idea what he/she’s got. Tom
Discussion Forum
“Notice that at no time do my fingers leave my hand”
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialCategories
Discussion Forum
Digital Plans Library
Member exclusive! – Plans for everyone – from beginners to experts – right at your fingertips.
Highlights
-
Shape Your Skills
when you sign up for our emails
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. -
Shop Talk Live Podcast
-
Our favorite articles and videos
-
E-Learning Courses from Fine Woodworking
-
-
Replies
Well you can't say he doesn't offer a lot of detailed pictures:) But it looks like a junker to me.
Troy
Tom, I'm clueless on the original, pristine, Stanleys and waaayyyy to tired tonight to try and research. Might you be kind and give me a few hints, or even a complete list, of the abominations.
FG
I say this from memory of the images (too horrible to return to) ..
Mainly the side walls have been ground into low slung curves. This is likely to have been an attempt to disguise a broken/cracked side (so someone decided to make it look fancy). The other is the chipped lever cap, which is minor.
This is still a good deal for someone who wants it for parts - to keep or to sell on. This is a case when the sum of the parts is greater than the whole! :)
Regards from Perth
Derek
Yes Derek,
I was going to say that somebody obviously chipped out a piece from one of the sides and then just re-shaped the whole thing to suit....Tragic.Philip Marcou
Ah! Not so subtle things, eh? Yes, that body is u-g-l-y! I didn't look past the small picture at the top, and the description. I don't care for corrugated. Wouldn't mind having the blade maybe. Extra for my plane.forestgirl -- you can take the girl out of the forest, but you can't take the forest out of the girl ;-)
Ugly, yes, collectable, no (except for the parts), but wouldn't it also make a fairly decent user assuming the side walls have enough meat in them so the sole doesn't flex excessively? The mouth seems OK and with a bit of sole flattening and other standard tune up proceedures, you would still have the relatively large contact areas of frog to bed, and blade to frog, that make the Bedrock design a bit nicer than the Bailey pattern planes.
Steve,
That's exactly what I was thinking. That plane will probably flex quite a bit with a little downward force placed on it, and that wouldn't work effectively as a smoother.
Jeff
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled