Has anyone ever tried both the Forrest 12″ Chopmaster 80T and the Freud LU85R012 (96T). I have a 12″ Dewalt sliding DCMS currently running a Freud TKR407 (80T) and am looking for something that will produce cleaner cuts (less tearout, more stability), any ideas or suggestions
Discussion Forum
Get It All!
UNLIMITED Membership is like taking a master class in woodworking for less than $10 a month.
Start Your Free TrialCategories
Discussion Forum
Digital Plans Library
Member exclusive! – Plans for everyone – from beginners to experts – right at your fingertips.
Highlights
-
Shape Your Skills
when you sign up for our emails
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. -
Shop Talk Live Podcast
-
Our favorite articles and videos
-
E-Learning Courses from Fine Woodworking
-
-
Replies
For a sliding compound miter saw, I believe you need a lower hook angle. The LU85 (Ultimate Cutoff Blade) has a 10* hook angle. It produces a fabulous surface. I use it on end grain that will show, and it comes out polished to an amazing sheen. That being said, I'm not sure it's your best choice in the Freud line for a sliding compound miter saw. Lemme see if I can find my catalog. I'll be back! :-)
forestgirl -- you can take the girl out of the forest, but you can't take the forest out of the girl ;-)
Another proud member of the "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
Edited 11/18/2005 11:42 am by forestgirl
Thanks for the suggestion, I actually called Freud and they said the same thing. In essence their take is that the LU85 is their best blade for use on miter saws but when sliding with a SCMS the cutting dynamics are changed and the negative hook angle of the LU91 helps to (1) keep the stock in position against the table, and (2) reduce jerkiness during sliding cuts as the tendency for the blade to pull into the wood is reduced, the result slower but smoother sliding cuts. Judging from the opinion of Larry at Freud and other opinions I have found out in cyberspace (including those of Bobabeui) it seems that for smaller stock and plain CMS's the LU85 is probably the best blade out there (who knows about the new Forrest Miter Masters, but with the LU85 at $120 V's the FMM at $250 I think the choice is probably an easy one, I doubt that the FMM cuts are worth paying twice the price for given that total blade life is probably similar).
Hopefully this will be useful info for others out there who are cutting wood for pleasure or profit, or perhaps are like me and are nearing the end of a largely solo effort to build a house (1 year to get permits, 1 year to get it liveable (final inspection), 6 months and counting to actually make it all look pretty, tile, trim, flooring etc)
Cheers, Jade.
Glad you got to talk to Freud. There's a Freud member here at Knots too, name is Charles M., not a salesperson but a technical person, so any time you have a question, you can address him in the title of your post.
It's really important, IMHO, to keep "miter saws" and "sliding miter saws" in mind as two different machines. I've never used a sliding saw, but from what I've seen and read it's obvious they handle very differently, and while most of the crosscut blades can cross over (ooooo, bad) from table saws to regular miter saws, it's apparent the sliding saws require a specific configuration for optimum safe performance.
If anyone can find a blade that outperforms the LU85, I'd pay to see it! Fat chance, and can't even imagine paying double the price for any blade. Wow!forestgirl -- you can take the girl out of the forest, but you can't take the forest out of the girl ;-)Another proud member of the "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
PS:
"nearing the end of a largely solo effort to build a house " Wow! That's great. I visited one of our members down in the Vancouver, WA, area last month and saw the house he built over a period of years. Boggled my mind! You guys have vision!forestgirl -- you can take the girl out of the forest, but you can't take the forest out of the girl ;-)Another proud member of the "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
Not sure is vision is the right word in my case, more like a case of biting off more than I could chew and then somehow gnawing my way through it. Some builders I knew were going to help me, but once I actually started work on the project they made themselves scarce. Also, my father ( a builder) came over from N.Z. to help me when we were supposed to be getting permits but then the county screwed with us for the next 9 months and he ended up having to go home before we even dug the hole for the foundation. He did come back again once it was all framed and we did the siding, metal roof, and deck together.
Anyway now we are off the subject. Thanks again for the advice.
The Freud model recommended for sliding saws is the LU91. In the 12" version it's a 72T blade, ATB, with a negative-5-degree hook. The negative hook is what helps with "stability" IIRC.
forestgirl -- you can take the girl out of the forest, but you can't take the forest out of the girl ;-)
Another proud member of the "I Rocked With ToolDoc Club" .... :>)
Jade-P,
I have both the blades you mentioned, but they are in a Dewalt 12 inch CMS (not a slider).
I would have to say the Freud LU85 has it all over the Chopmaster, much cleaner cut with less tearout, the cut is literly smooth like a babies behind. On the downside the LU85 really taxes the power of the saw, where the Chopmaster does not have such a problem, I use both to only cut mouldings nothing else.
As ForestGirl suggested the LU85 might not be the proper blade for a SCMS
PS: I love my Forrest Woodworker II on my tablesaw and the Forrest Dado King
Best of luck
I swear by the 100t FS Tools # LM6300 blade on my Makita LS1212 slider as well as the FS Tools blades on my TS.
http://www.calwoodmach.com/tools/sawBlades.html
John O'Connell - JKO Handcrafted Woodworking
The more things change ...
We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams, we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.
Petronious Arbiter, 210 BC
This forum post is now archived. Commenting has been disabled