restorick

@BayREAU - pure rubbish. Are you trying to tell me that this guy had no clue that a Ryobi table saw didn't have "flesh detectors"?

He had options here. He could have purchased a hand saw, but then it would have been less accurate and taken more time to get the job done.

He could have decided to become a plumber too, and not have to worry about sharp whirly things without "flesh detectors".

He could have used his brain and figured out that either the cut was too dangerous or that he was out of his league.

Where the hell is common sense anymore? Oh wait, the trial was in Boston, right? Nevermind...