notrapsoptonlinenet

Although some people seem to feel that all government regulations have some underlying malevolent purpose, it is clear to me that among government’s legitimate functions is to protect its citizens. It is true that everyone should be responsible for their own actions and safety. Proper training and technique would prevent most accidents. However, the reality is that, at some time or other, everyone makes careless (and possibly dangerous) mistakes. Some people make more than others. Saying woodworkers have to be responsible for their actions doesn’t grow back fingers or pay for medical bills. It takes only one instant of inattention for an otherwise careful woodworker to become an injured woodworker. Ultimately, we all may have to contribute to paying his medical bills. Wouldn’t it be better to insist that dangerous tools be manufactured “idiot proof”?

With regard to making a profit from licensing the Saw Stop mechanism, isn’t that what our free enterprise system is about? Other manufacturers had years to come up with an alternative safety system and they did nothing. (Adding the riving knife was a no-brainer and a European innovation.) I disagree with the court ruling that gave rise to this debate, especially the apportionment of blame. However, I think that government has the right and duty to set safety requirements for table saws.

Other than a larger shop - mine is 10'x20' - any Leigh-Neilson or Veritas plane would be welcome. I love tools, especially hand planes and chisels. I would also consider a new band saw with a greater resaw capcity such as the new Grizzly or a Rikon or Laguna. But I’ll settle for good health and the time time to do all the projects that are in my head, Have a wonderful holiday.

steveprice