Fine Woodworking friends:
Take two valium and call me in the morning. When the 'market' does not respond on safety issues, the government must! Detroit didn't put all the safety features we find in today's automobiles because the 'market' delivered the goods, so government had to act in the absence of market action. The same goes for tools. I for one welcome safer tools. Yes I am careful. Yes I take pride in knowing how to use my tools safely. Yes I still have all my fingers and thumbs. But I know that every time I'm in my shop, I could have an accident and do myself some serious lifelong harm. So if safer saws add somewhat to the cost of tools, so be it. With regulation, manufacturers will be compelled to research 'better mousetraps', and if the history of the auto sector is any guide, they will do it and do it well and we'll all be the better for it.
By the way, that's be $100 for the medical advice.
Halfmoon Bay, B.C.
Mmmm....I love the smell of burnt skin in the morning!
Shave mister? Don't do it! Sand beard away, the beautiful way with grit...G...R...I...T..., grit!
Come on folks! Get with it! FW's bias is hanging out by the virtue of the headline of the story "Table saw safety goes under the microscope -- again"! One can almost hear the sigh of frustration before you get to the text of the article.
I have a table saw without saw stop and I still have all my digits, because I am careful and know how to use the tool...and because I'm lucky! But had I lost a finger, would that make by inept or stupid? No, but it place me in the ranks of the unluckuy. And the 10 homeshop woodworkers a day who lost fingers aren't inept or stupid either, they had an accident, plain and simple, nothing more.
The saw stop technology is the first of what will be a new generation of safety devices has caught a lot of attention, and so it should. Everyone agrees that adding that or similarly functioning devices will cost more money. So what? Look at the carnage it will prevent! It would cost a lot less to build cars without seat belts, air bags, impact absorbing bumpers, safety glass, horns, brake lights, and a host of other safety features. So why do we all expect and demand those safety devices on automobiles? Because they save lives!
Why did it take government regulations to force those changes on the auto industry? Because they added to corporate costs and cut into profits. It is a rare corporation who voluntarily adds to their costs at the expense of their bottom line simply to make a device safer. Individual manufactures want to be out of sync with other companies who don't offer such features because they fear the resultant higher profits of their competitors will attract more investment capital than they can attract. But with government regulation, the problem is solved. If every car manufacturer has to build cars with the required safety features, no manufacturer has an advantage or disadvantage in the commercial market place. It is then up to the manufacturer to design to achieve the regulated standard, and in the process, competing firms come up with better mousetraps at relatively lower prices and the overall quality of the product improves.
The same would happen if all saw manufacturers were mandated to employ injury preventing technology. As soon as it is a requirement to employ such technology, a market is created and inventive minds will devise more and better ways to achieve the mandated standard. Saw stop may gain an initial edge, but you can be sure that it won't be long before other equally good or better options emerge, and in the process, a lot of jobs will be created designing and building the new technology and we will all be better off for it.
The manufacturers' concern that use of the technology would imply some measure of liability would go out the window with government regulation. That is because their iron clad defense in a claim against them as to why a particular manufacturer employed saw stop or similarly purposed technology becomes simple, 'because we were required to do so by law'!
And let's give our heads a shake. Government regulation is not the thin edge of the wedge to socialism, it is in fact one of the most important functions of government in a democratic society. We don't regulate those things that are socially desirable and morally laudable. We don't have laws that say parents must love their children, because, with rare exception, we all do! We don't have laws that people must care for their pets, because, with rare exception, we all do! We create regulations in cases where it become evident that people or corporations do things that do not demonstrate responsibility to protect the public interest. So we have laws that say you cannot dump poisons into the environment, because in the past, without those laws, we found that some failed in their responsibilities. We have laws that say you cannot rob your neighbors house because we found that some failed in their responsibilities. Where people and corporations consistently act in a responsible manner, we need no regulations. Where that is not the case, we do!
Regulation, simply put, is the rational, collective response to the lack of individual and/or corporate responsibility. It is not socialism. It is not Big Brother. It is not too big government. It is not something to set one's hair on fire over. It is a necessary function of responsible government.
Halfmoon Bay, BC.,
I completely agree that it is sad that yet another quality tool maker appears to be sliding farther down the slippery slope to mediocrity, but the the sale of Delta is simply a continuation of a process that's been going on for a very long time. Stanley Black & Decker is not in the business of making tools. They are in the business of making money! They just happen to make tools in order to make money, just as GM, or MacDonalds or Starbucks, or Chase Manhattan is first and foremost in the business of making money, and chooses to make cars, hamburgers, coffee or lend money to accomplish that goal. That's why Stanley Black & Decker sold Delta, plain and simple! The business of big business is to make money, as much as possible, as fast as possible. Quality and customer relations are important only to the extent that a company needs to maintain a client base sufficient to accomplish the primary goal...to make money! There are still lots of small and medium sized family owned businesses that started with and maintain the concept of delivering quality at a fair price, but once those companies are bought out and become absorbed into a larger corporate empire, run by 'professional managers', the scale of whose financial remuneration is inversely proportional to the duration of their focus and vision, quality becomes at best a secondary consideration. This is not a phenomenon driven by employees or unions they may choose to represent them. This is a phenomenon driven by the top echelons of the respective business empires made easier by the policies of the political minions their money buys them.
With so many good jobs exported from North America over the last several decades, at the hands of these same corporate empires, for the same reason, ie. to make more money, there has been a serious shrinkage in the average disposable income of Canadians and Americans relative to our cost of living. This fuels the drive to sell cheaper, lower quality goods, because our collective purchasing power to buy better quality tools is shrinking.
Having said that, it is still sad to see Delta slide further down the slippery slope.
Halfmoon Bay, B.C., Canada
Routing - A Haiku
By Gregory Paolini
router is power
grain is true and clear
maple chips fly free
Greg's routing philosophy..."before beginning, cleanse your mind of all non-routing thoughts, find your routing zone...and BE THE ROUTER!"
I use furniture grade plywood quite extensively. Always for pieces that are unseen, usually for panels and the like, with solid wood reserved for edges and frames where joinery is either necessary or a feature of the design. I may or may not use it for tops, depending on the design and appication. I accept the fact that on the basis of board foot pricing good quality plywood, carefully chosen, is no cheaper than solid wood, but whether I am doing a piece for the love of it or for a price, I value my time, and not at some miserable minimum wage rate! There is no way solid wood can compete with plywood when supply price and labour time are taken into consideration for the uses I put it to.
While I agree that were I to be making an heirloom piece or a commissioned piece where price and time was of little concern, then for sure I'd go with solid wood all the way, but in my neck of the woods, if I confined my building to producing for whom cost was not an issue, I wouldn't be spending much time in my shop. The reality is that the vast majority of people who want a custom piece of furniture or cabinetry still have a necessary eye pinned on price, and so plywood is usually a part of the solution to produce a beautiful piece at a reasonable price.
Many have talked about breaking plywood down with a circular saw before using the table saw, and I do this extensively. I have a self made cutting guide, designed like a flat truss to avoid warpage or deflection, which I clamp to the plywood sheet to guide my saw with a fine toothed, thin kerf blade. If the particular piece is to be lodged in a dado, that is my final cut, whether ripped or cross-cut (with the use of tape of course). It it needs refinement, I use the table saw with my glue line blade and that is the final cut before actually gluing.
So...that's my two cents worth.
I too agree with the wipe on adherents! Its a great product and because you can wipe on multiple coats in a day, there is no concern about bonding. While the surface feels 'dry' to the human hand within an hour or so, chemically it is still actively curing so the additional coats fully bond with the previous coat. Once all your coats are done, let your piece sit for several days before being pressed into service so the multiple layers have time to fully cure and harden. I tend to dislike a really glossy finish, so I often wet sand the final coat with 1500 wet- dry, available from auto body supply sources, and then sometimes rub it down with rottenstone. The surface is amazingly beautiful and sensual to the touch!
Most of the posts above have already captured what I my sentiments, ie. an inspiration is one thing, a duplicate or copy is another, but frankly, both have their place. When someone commissions you to create a copy of a piece, historical or otherwise, they want what they want, ie. a copy, not a version of copy, and almost always a single copy, so go for it, but do fully credit the original designer/builder. But the vast majority of what us woodbutchers produce are in fact inspirations from and not copies of. If it you have produced a truly unique design, wonderful, take full credit! But even then let's face it, there are really only so many ways to resist gravity and hold a human bum 17" or so inches, or a plate 30" or so off the floor? Other and scale and materials, how much different are the elevated stone slabs of Stonehenge from a table? So unless you are running a sizeable production shop and copying someone else's work without consent or credit, I say go for it, but once again, do credit your inspirations when they deserve it. Your customer will appreciate your willingness to learn from and be inspired by others.
But I also want to make a point about even using the word 'profit' as it applies to what most of us do. A 'profit' is what is left over after all the costs of production and marketing are covered: all the wood, the finish, the heat, light and power, the tools and all the labour, including the cost of gathering the materials, time spent designing, building, finishing and packaging as well as delivering the finished product to the customer and the time spent doing the books and banking. You only have a 'profit' if you still have money left over all of that, and I'm willing to bet darn few of us find ourselves in that boat too often. That really only comes about by running a production shop of some reasonable scale with paid employees producing copies, inspirations or original designs for a sizeable market. For the vast majority of us, the best you can expect is to pay yourself wages, and frankly, that's enough, because being able to earn a living doing what you love doing and would do whether or not you got paid, is not too bad a way to live! All most of us are really doing while producing a piece for sale, is being compensated for the time that we commit to the total, some better than others, but few can honestly claim to have made 'a profit'.
Halfmoon Bay, B.C.
Like so many before me...it depends. It depends on the price of the new tool, and whether the features available on the new tool make it worthwhile despite a higher price. It depends on whether it is a difficult to replace tool, ie. not made any more, hard to find, has features no longer available. It depends on the availability of parts, either new or finding another used one to cannabalize. Jef
Subscribe now and save up to 56%
© 2017 The Taunton Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
Become a member and get instant access to thousands of videos, how-tos, tool reviews, and design features.
Start your subscription today and save up to 56%