The Editors Mailbox

The Editors Mailbox

Just Plane Trivia: Why Do They Call It a Frog?

comments (7) June 2nd, 2011 in blogs

elizh elizabeth healy, senior copy editor
thumbs up 9 users recommend

It kind of does look like that thing on top of a handplane, doesnt it?
It kind of does look like that thing in the pond, doesnt it?
Just because this is FWW, we need a nice drawing so you can see exactly what the frog is.
It kind of does look like that thing on top of a handplane, doesnt it? - CLICK TO ENLARGE

It kind of does look like that thing on top of a handplane, doesn't it?


It's safe to say that in the six-plus years I've been roaming the sawdusty halls of Fine Woodworking, I have read and copyedited dozens of articles about handplanes.

But until last week, it never occurred to me to ask this question:

Why the heck is that nifty doohickey that supports the blade assembly on a handplane called a "frog?" If you stare at it long enough, it kind of looks like a frog. Could this be why?

I put it to my esteemed colleagues.

At first, my question was met with deafening silence. This is unusual around here, especially with Matt Kenney in the room.

Then the responses started to trickle in.

"It keeps the blade from hopping around," said Tom McKenna.

The always helpful Ed Pirnik replied: (To be read in a "Cliff Claven" voice) "Well, ya see there, ahh, Liz, back in Roman times, they, ahh, used the oil secreted by the ahhh, acanthus frog to lubricate the simple plane irons they were usin' back then. And, err, so  over time, it became, ahh, known as a 'frog.'"

"It's because it's in the throat of the plane," Matt said.

Obviously, it was time to go outside the office for answers.

"I'll bet [Chris] Gochnour will know. He is a huge Stanley buff," said Asa Christiana. But the Goch said he didn't know.

Matt asked Deneb Puchalski of Lie-Nielsen, who said he thinks it harkens back to the definition of "frog" as a depression imprinted in the upper surface of a brick. "This describes in some ways the function of a frog in a plane," he said. "There may be a connection. Anyway, we call the bedding point for the frog the 'lily pad,' just because."

 "Because it vaguely resembles a crouched frog.....really....I'm  not kidding!" said Rollie Johnson. Since this is what I had originally thought, I was going to go with Rollie's answer. It made sense, and it made me feel smart. Everybody wins.

But then Mark Schofield chimed in, having consulted Ernie Conover. And here is what Ernie said:

"I had somehow thought  that it was because a Bailey frog looks like a frog. I looked through a lot of books to get a definitive answer. The most exact, and convincing, reason is found in Rodger K. Smith's Patented Transitional & Metallic planes in America 1827 -1927." He sent along a copy of the page.

I'm going to paraphrase the book because it does go on. It says the first inventor to use the term "frog" in reference to the handplane was Justus A. Traut, who worked for the Stanley Rule & Level Company in the late 1800s. Apparently Traut and his co-workers started calling the thing a frog because it is just behind the throat—and harkened back to the saying "I've got a frog in my throat." Stanley didn't start using the term publicly in their documents for many years.

As much as I hate to admit it, that wiseacre Matt Kenney appears to have been right.

Drat.

Now on to my next question: Why do they call it a mill bastard file?

 



posted in: blogs, handplanes


Comments (7)

Rhino40 Rhino40 writes: In heraldry (Coats of Arms), a nobleman's legitimate children might have a diagonal charge (known as a bar, bend or baton) running from the upper left corner of the shield to the lower right ("dexter").

His illegitimate offspring ("bastards"), on the other hand, would instead have their status reflected by arms bearing a charge that ran from upper right corner to lower left. This is known as a "bar sinister", "bend sinister", or "baton sinister".

I believe that originally most files had a tooth direction which ran a certain way to accommodate right-handed users; files for shaping or sharpening metal--whose tooth pattern runs the opposite way--were therefore said to be "left-handed", "sinister" or "bastard" files.

Of course, I could be wrong.
Posted: 11:50 am on June 9th

elizh elizh writes: Steve, you have a point. Your frog is much more "fine."

Posted: 6:03 am on June 3rd

woodheat woodheat writes:
Posted: 4:50 pm on June 2nd

saschafer saschafer writes:
I think Rollie's right. But your choice of frog photo isn't the best; a bullfrog is too heavy in the hindquarters. The resemblance is much better with one of the smaller species, like this wood frog:

http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10370_12145_12201-60113--,00.html

-Steve

Posted: 3:42 pm on June 2nd

flairwoodworks flairwoodworks writes: Mill because it cuts; bastard because it's coarse; file because it's a file.
Posted: 3:18 pm on June 2nd

woodheat woodheat writes: Lia, I still think we're right.......and there's something fishy about this Justus guy, I just can't quite put my finger on it.

Rollie
Posted: 2:47 pm on June 2nd

MKenney MKenney writes: Liz,

I would object to how you've portrayed me in this blog if it weren't so accurate!

Matt
Posted: 2:38 pm on June 2nd

You must be logged in to post comments. Log in.

Advertise here for as little as $50. Learn how

Save up to 52% on Fine Woodworking

 

Become a Better Woodworker

ABOUT THE EDITORS MAILBOX

FineWoodworking.com editors report from the woodworking front lines. Check in every weekday for news, information, projects, and answers to questions from Fine Woodworking readers everywhere.

Learn about our new format!

Archive: Temporarily unavailable. Stay tuned and sorry for the inconvenience.