-
How to Cut Sliding Dovetail Joints -
Buying and Using Trim Routers -
How to Make a Simple Jig for Offset Knife Hinges -
Five Minute Guide: Glue-Ups -
3 Steps to Great Glue-Ups: Sliding Dovetail Joints -
How to Sharpen a Card Scraper -
Upgrade Your Jointer with a Segmented Cutterhead -
Five Minute Guide: How to Use a Tablesaw -
Dedicated Sled Delivers Perfect Finger Joints -
T-Track is a Smart Workbench Accessory -
How to Apply an Aerosol Finish -
Best Tabletop Finish -
How to Drill Windsor Chair Mortises -
Router Jig for Perfectly Aligned Dadoes -
Fixing Woodworking Mistakes -
Box Making Tips and Tricks -
Tablesaw Tapering Jig is Safer and Faster
Top-Notch Tools for Less: WoodRiver's New V3 Block Planes
comments (29) March 8th, 2011 in blogs
Did you see Chris Gochnour’s recent review of the new WoodRiver block planes?
Back in 2009, when he reviewed the first release of WoodRiver planes, Gochnour was not impressed with the tools.
But the manufacturer seems to have taken feedback to heart and revamped the designs. We were happy to review the block planes again and this time, Gochnour’s assessment was chock full of superlatives: “flawlessly made,” “fine machining,” and “great performance.”
| More Handplane Tech | ||
![]() Guide to Block Planes |
![]() Sharpening Plane Irons |
|
|
|
||
But the real question is... what do you folks think? Has anyone out there purchased or tried these planes? Any comments?
And what do you think of the price? These planes are cheaper than higher-end counterparts, under $100 for one of them. Yet Gochnour said that the performance was “on a par with other premium block planes.”
Does this affect how you look at hand tools? If you’re a power-tool junkie, does the potential to buy higher quality for a lower price entice you to try more hand tool work?
posted in: blogs, handplanes, WoodRiver
Become a Better Woodworker
ABOUT TOOL ADDICTS
If you enjoy woodworking then you probably also suffer from an addiction to tools. Whether you collect hand planes or seek out the latest and greatest in power tools, our expert tool addicts will keep you in the loop with news, reviews, and commentary on the latest in woodworking tools.
New: Don’t miss posts by contributing editor Roland (aka Rollie) Johnson. Over the year’s Rollie’s tested countless tools for the magazine. His fascination with motors and gears goes beyond woodworking, he's also an enthusiastic hot-rodder who likes to restore old cars, and is the author of Automotive Woodworking (Motor Books International, 2002).
Contact us: Keep us in the loop on tool news or ideas for this blog. Email the editors at fw at taunton.com or “tweet” Rollie via Twitter at https://twitter.com/Toolwriter.



















Comments (29)
Posted: 10:28 pm on April 1st
Posted: 9:41 pm on March 28th
Posted: 11:25 am on March 28th
Posted: 10:17 pm on March 21st
Just wanted to know if the Wood River planes do a decent job.
Posted: 12:57 pm on March 21st
I get more for my dollar, and American firms can keep up or follow Delta.
Carry on.
Posted: 12:00 pm on March 21st
It comes as no surprise probably that the LN won this little match-up hands down. How much is due to the fact that I plunked down the $350 asking price some time ago is up to you to decide. It’s been a while since I set this plane up for myself, but it always has been a rock solid performer. The blade took a great edge, and unless I do something stupid, requires a minimum of maintanence to keep razor sharp. The weight, and the design of the tool makes it naturally do what a plane is supposed to do, and it does it very well. The tote is designed right, the adjustments are easy and it holds that adjustment precisely. It is just a pleasure to use. It's hard to quantify that attribute, and if you don't value it, then the LN probably isn't for you.
Second comes the Wood River (I think it goes for ~$150). It was a little harder to set up than I remember the LN being, but it did get to the point where it did an adequate job. It could never really match the LN, but it did OK. I didn't like the tote, but those can be a personal preference. I've been using the LN for years, and anything different feels a bit foreign. I got a good edge on the iron after some difficulty. We'll have to see how long it lasts. I got acceptable shavings on Maple, Cherry and Hickory. (A bit more tear-out on the hickory, but that's a pretty tough test)
The old Stanley ($80) was equivalent on performance to the WR,harder to set up, but it is a sentimental favorite. It obviously belonged to someone who used it, but it was well cared for. The iron was sharpened with a relief on the ends to avoid the dreaded plane marks (This was a bit too much relief for my taste, but I ended up grinding it off and starting over.) I actually liked the way the tool handled. The tote was very comfortable to me, but the plane just seemed a bit light weight for my taste in a #5. It was, to be honest, a real b**ch to set up, but it got there. This tool was made a long time ago and there have been many improvements since that might make a strict comparison unfair. Bottom line, once you get a plane where you like it, it should stay there without too much fussing. Let’s see if this one does. Performance on the maple, cherry and hickory were almost identical to the WR. Neither was as good as the LN.
Putting the political and economic arguments aside, these three tools all serve a purpose in today’s marketplace. If you need your tools to be the best they can be, and you appreciate the design and craftsmanship of the LN tool line, the price tag is not an issue. It is worth every penny. If you need a plane to do what a plane does, the WR might be just fine for you. Keep in mind, you may eventually want to buy an LN, but the WR may serve quite well for now, so why risk the cash now if you don’t need to (or have it). I am glad I bought the Stanley for the son-in law. I hope it will give him the idea of what a quality tool is all about and that he starts to appreciate that quality. He may want an LN someday, but what he got is a pretty good match to the WR, and it’s got some history to it.
Posted: 11:52 am on March 21st
America and I include Canada makes superb second to no other hand tools. I have an Estwing hammer that has been with me for 40 years, I also use a No.6 and a No.7 plane, made by union around 1919. I had very minor recovery work to make them serviceable after receiving them around 1990 from Canada. They are used exclusively on Australian hard woods and perform admirably. I also have the excellent Veritas planes and expect that after my demise they will be in service for another generation, or two. The Chinese tools may fit a niche for handy men and hobbyists, they are after all only reverse engineered copies of American tools, however for dedicated wood professionals and serious amateurs there is no comparison to "real" tools expensive they may be, but will be passed on an admiring generation of wood workers.
Posted: 4:28 am on March 21st
Posted: 12:55 pm on March 20th
Its not really about China vs the US but about the base level quality that a manufacturer is prepared to put into their product. Stanley, a once proud American company, is prepared to shame itself by putting marketing above product quality, by putting a lack of delivery of adequate products behind profit.
Its about attitude and an approach to quality which the US has now lost. Were I Stanley I would want to know where the delivery of actual sound working products had evaporated to. They claim such quality but do not deliver.
Woodriver seems to deliver at a good level of quality for a reasonable price. Thats it.
The bitterness of low quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price.
Alan
Posted: 6:28 pm on March 14th
Hows about another example: I use aluminum bar clamps a lot. I have some manufactured by Universal Clamp (US)@ about $23 per and some made in china for about $12per. They both clamp right? The universal clamp was obviously designed by someone who actually uses them and will absolutely be the first ones off the shelf for me. The chinese ones are becoming obsolete in my collection because they fail(None of the Universal's have done that) and it is more cost effective for me to buy it once and keep it. How much more expensive is a tool that costs twice as much and lasts 10 times longer?
At work I depend on the raw materials being specified and use will meet the need with a bit to spare. At home I want my tools to show the same kind of quality and craftsmanship that I try to show in my furniture. The US can't compete with China when it comes to cheap, so I don't want LN to learn how to mass produce their planes just to make them cheaper. They not only come out of the box ready to use, they will be ready and able to do the job for a long time to come. I can depend on that.
If you aim for minimum quality at a minimum price, you end up with a market flooded with cheap crap with little or no differentiation. I only hope there are enough of us out there who can appreciate quality and craftsmanship in our work and our tools.
Posted: 3:19 pm on March 14th
Luckily for me, my disposable income is not very great so I can't even afford to consider such names as Lie Nielsen (the lucky bit is that my choice is much narrower and thus choosing becomes more straightforward). Most of my tools are strictly of the bargain basement kind and I have to make up for their deficiencies by building my own skills. Personally, I can't afford to care where the tool comes from, I can only worry about getting the best tool I can in my price range.
Posted: 11:03 am on March 14th
enjoy the day....say ho to your friends
Posted: 11:01 pm on March 13th
Posted: 9:02 pm on March 13th
Posted: 7:33 pm on March 13th
Now on the issue of China...
To Minnesota and others that prescribe to the view that if we want or current lifestyle... I would care to argue we enjoy our current lifestyle precisely and entirely because we buy from China.
As others have pointed out, the whole Buy American thing is getting even more blurred by the fact that where something is made is not the same as where the materials were sourced. Would you gladly buy Teak from an American distributor knowing the wood is not coming from a managed forest. With most products you have no idea where the equivalent "forest" is located, but I doubt it stops anybody as long as they FEEL like they are doing their part to keep American jobs.
Another curious thing is when it comes to economics everybody talks like we'd love to bury other countries with our superiority, but every time some natural disaster happens we're shelling out billions to help
I don't think there is any easy answer to our predicament. America over the last 40 years or so decided we could retire as a country and just start living off our wealth, in the last 10-12 years we decided we could just manufacture synthetic wealth (everything you need to know in life you learn by about 4th grade, read the "Emperor has no clothes" and it pretty much sums up what you need to know about economic bubbles). As many current retirees are figuring out when the money starts to run low you either need to get off your butt and start working or reduce your lifestyle. Most things in life are not black and white I imagine America's answer will be a little bit of both. And make no mistake this is not a democrat/republican thing, look at a graph of the debt in inflation adjust dollars, it's an exponential curve upward that pays no regard to what party was in power. We have done this to ourselves as an entire country. Like a family sitting at the dinner table with the funds running low, we need to stop arguing about who got us into this mess and get on with the business of working more and living with less.
The most important thing is to realize is these things happen at a society level, on an individual level there will be opportunities galore in this country, the tide may be going out but if you know which way the water is flowing you can keep swimming.
Posted: 7:12 pm on March 13th
Posted: 9:01 am on March 12th
Say what you will but if you would like future generations of Americans to enjoy the same standard of living that we do today then WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES! Purchase and demand American made when you can or at least buy goods from country's with similar free market practices.
China IS NOT a free market. The playing field IS NOT EVEN CLOSE to level.
Give me LIE NIELSON made in the USA or VERITAS from Canada, but China??? Free market??? PLEASE.....
Posted: 9:54 pm on March 11th
D. Scott
Posted: 5:06 pm on March 10th
I can agree with the "buy US sentiment" but that is totally irrelevant IMHO. Yes I tend to avoid Chinese stuff largely because of poor QC. But paying a premium of over $150 for the LN No 6 and about 2.5x for the low angle block is silly.
I just ordered a LN No 62 and some extra irons because of the versatility and it is supposed to be in Friday. IMHO LN and LV tools are great and worth the money, but I can't afford to ignore bargain priced alternates.
Posted: 1:31 pm on March 10th
With the Stanley line of tools began lowering in quality to lower price point (to open a new market base), a void was left for higher-end customers. Woodworkers then had a choice to make, buy lower quality, buy old used higher quality, or pay a premium for new higher quality. And for the past few decades this is where the hand tool market has resided, and the “premium” is at a MUCH higher ratio for hand tools than stationary power tools, in no small part due to market pressures brought about by the introduction of Grizzly tools to the American market more than a decade ago.
I have not used a Wood River plane, so I cannot speak to the quality-price ration of their tools, but if they are as good as the review claims, it is a good thing for woodworking in general, it will force the American market to compete or close doors (remember the Automotive crap coming out of Detroit in the '70's '80's? - thanks to the Japanese, American auto manufacturing can now compete with the best in the world market (within a price point of course)). And I bet my fellow posters here would have - or did - continued to buy the American crap back then just because they “Buy only American.” The ONLY way to improve the quality-price ration in American tools is for woodworking consumers to buy tools with the best quality-price ratio - regardless of where they are made. Free-market forces have, and will continue to, rule and American manufacturing will as it always has, rise to the task. And I predict if Wood River continues to improve in quality, they will do for hand tools what Grizzly did for stationary power tools, which is to say MUCH better quality-price ratios (Delta’s uni-saw is cheaper today (in inflation adjusted dollars) than their old saws of lesser quality, thanks to the competitive fixed power tool market).
* All of this of course is discounting the fact that the tax burden on manufacturing in the U.S. is now at the 50% point of GDP, and higher than nearly any other country except for middle Europe – anyone seeing inexpensive high-quality tools – or anything else for that matter – coming out of England or France?). And the only way to fix this situation sadly is to have more American firms send their manufacturing off shore until the politicians realize that to be competitive in the world market; we cannot balance our debt on the backs of the American business man, since those costs are then borne by consumers who have other choices. In other words, Atlas is shrugging, and sadly it appears that it must continue to happen in order to wake up D.C.
Posted: 1:09 pm on March 10th
Posted: 9:28 am on March 10th
Posted: 8:26 am on March 10th
Posted: 7:58 am on March 10th
In the rare cases when I've thought I needed a new plane, the only manufacturers I've seriously considered are Lie-Nielsen for improved traditional designs (I own a small shoulder plane) or Veritas for innovative new designs (I own a large shoulder plane and a low angle smoother). WoodRiver is a non-starter.
Posted: 3:02 pm on March 9th
Posted: 11:32 am on March 9th
Posted: 11:11 am on March 9th
Posted: 10:49 am on March 9th
For me, I prefer Lie Nielsen because they are "Made in USA" while Woodriver planes are made in China
Posted: 8:49 am on March 9th
You must be logged in to post comments. Log in.